Regis Resources
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Regis Resources
    • Board of Directors
    • Senior Management
    • Corporate Directory
    • Corporate Governance
  • Projects
    • WA Projects
      • WA Project Map
      • Moolart Well
      • Rosemont
      • Garden Well
      • Erlistoun
      • Collurabbie
      • Satellite Deposits
    • NSW Projects
      • NSW Project Map
      • McPhillamys Gold Project
    • Resources and Reserves
  • Corporate Responsibility
    • Environment
      • Environment
      • Dams and Tailings Management
    • Community Relations
    • Occupational Health and Safety
    • Corporate Policies
    • Sustainability
  • Investors
    • ASX Announcements
    • Reports
    • Presentations
    • Broker Reports
    • Shareholder Centre
      • Shareholder Centre
      • Dividend Reinvestment Plan
      • Annual General Meeting
    • Conference Calls
  • Employment

Dams & Tailings Management

The design, construction, operation and closure of all TSFs in Western Australian mines must comply with the Mines Safety and Inspection Act 1994 (MSIA 1994), Mines Safety and Inspection Regulations 1995 (MSIR 1995) and Mining Act 1978 as well as the department’s codes and guidelines. This is completed in conjunction with the requirements, approval and licensing from the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER).

The Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (DMIRS) requires mining companies to undertake rigorous design processes that match the designated risk/consequence profile for each TSF regardless of construction method. These design processes are set out in DMIRS' code of practice and guidelines.

These detailed processes consider all the factors that can potentially impact on the stability of TSFs and the extent of unwanted outcomes. Examples of some of the factors assessed in the complex design processes include:

  • The location and general layout of the site;
  • Size and height of the TSF;
  • Nature of materials to be stored in the TSF;
  • Tailings deposition method;
  • The liquefaction potential of the tailings;
  • Assessment of the effects of TSF failures (dam break studies) under a combination of worst-case scenarios, and provision of control and management requirements;
  • Materials used for construction and foundations;
  • Climate, drainage, etc; and
  • Construction methods.

TSFs also require detailed and regular inspection and auditing, including the preparation and implementation of a site-specific Operating Manual which sets out the safe and environmentally acceptable operating procedures, monitoring and reporting requirements, trigger levels and actions to be taken to rectify any impending deficiencies.  Findings of audits must be submitted to DMIRS and DWER with compliance verified by their officers through site inspections and document review processes.

The Regis Approach to Tailings Management 

Regis adopts a risk management approach to tailings management that follows the life cycle of a TSF, including (but not limited to): 

  • site selection;
  • design;
  • construction;
  • operation;
  • emergency planning;
  • decommissioning planning and rehabilitation; and
  • decommissioning monitoring and maintenance.

To achieve the targeted management outcomes, and in line with the regulatory requirements and industry practice as outlined in the DMIRS “Code of Practice: Tailings storage facilities in Western Australia” and ANCOLD “Guidelines on Tailings Dams – Planning, Design, Construction, Operation and Closure”, detailed prescriptive methodologies and specific control measures are included in Regis:

  • project management plans;
  • mining proposals;
  • design reports;
  • project management plans prior to construction;
  • construction reports;
  • operating manual;
  • emergency response plans;
  • periodic environmental reports;
  • periodic audit reports;
  • decommissioning plans; and 
  • closure plans

This also includes the requirement for the use of independent TSF consultant engineers for the design and annual inspection of all Regis built TSFs as well as requirements for the provision of information, instruction, training and supervision to ensure the integrity of the TSFs and occupational safety and health of affected personnel.

Further and consistent with the principals of continuous improvement, the Regis approach to tailings management will continue to be modified by considering and incorporating relevant learnings from tailings incidents in other parts of the world along with any other relevant new information that will help in delivering further improvement.

Due to the remoteness of the current operations, no communities are affected by Regis’ current TSF footprints. However, Regis is considering a new mine project that would require a TSF being constructed near the local community. Regis does already and will continue to engage and communicate directly with that community prior to and as part of any approvals process being undertaken. 

Tailings Disclosure Inventory (as at September 2020)

1. "Tailings Facility" Name/identifier MWTSF1 MWTSF2 GWTSF1 GWTSF2 GWTSF3 BANTSF1
2. Location 122° 21' 41" Longitude; 27°35' 20" Latitude 122° 20' 45" Longitude; 27°37' 08" Latitude 122° 22' 26" Longitude; 27°53' 40" Latitude 122° 22' 14" Longitude; 27°54' 15" Latitude 122° 22' 47" Longitude; 27°55' 26" Latitude 122° 18' 58" Longitude; 27°57' 58" Latitude
3. Ownership Owned and operated Owned and operated Owned and operated Owned and operated Owned and Operated Owned (legacy site)
4. Status Closed Active Inactive Inactive Active Decommissioned in 1993
5. Date of initial operation 2010 2019 2012 2018 2020 1990
6. Is the Dam currently operated or closed as per currently approved design? Closed Yes Closed Closed Yes N/A
7. Raising method Downstream (Stages 1 - 3), Upstream (Stage 4) In-pit Downstream (Stage 1 & 2), Upstream (Stage 3) Downstream Downstream Initial 3 m starter embankment, then up to 4 x 1-1.5 m upstream raises (nominal 1.25 m each)
8. Current Maximum Height 28m NA - below ground level 23m 10m Up to 24 m (Stage 3) 8m (average 5.5m)
9. Current Tailings Storage lmpoundment Volume 22Mm3 ~1Mm3 24.3 Mm3 5Mm3 0Mm3 <0.7 Mm3
10. Planned Tailings Storage lmpoundment Volume in 5 years time. 23Mm3 8.8Mm3 39 Mm3 11Mm3 32 Mm3 <0.7 Mm3
11 .Most recent Independent Expert Review Jan-20 Scheduled for late 2020 Jan-20 Jan-20 Scheduled for late 2020 N/A
12. Do you have full and complete relevant engineering records including design, construction, operation, maintenance, and/or closure? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No, due to very old legacy site.

13. What is your hazard categorisation of this facility, based on the consequence of failure? (see Note 1)

DMIRS (2013) - Medium DMIRS (2013) - Low DMIRS (2013) - High DMIRS (2013) - Medium DMIRS (2013) - Medium DMIRS (2013) - Low
ANCOLD (2012) - Significant ANCOLD (2012) - Low ANCOLD (2012) - High C ANCOLD (2012) - Significant ANCOLD (2012) - Significant ANCOLD (2012) - Low
14. What guideline do you follow for the
classification system?
DMIRS & ANCOLD DMIRS & ANCOLD DMIRS & ANCOLD DMIRS & ANCOLD DMIRS & ANCOLD DMIRS & ANCOLD
15. Has this facility, at any point in its history, failed to be confirmed or certified as stable, or experienced notable stability concerns, as identified by an independent engineer (even if later certified as stable by the same or a different firm). No No No No No No
16. Do you have internal/in house engineering specialist oversight of this facility? Or do you have external engineering support for this purpose? Both Both Both Both Both Internal
17. Has a formal analysis of the downstream impact on communities, ecosystems and critical infrastructure in the event of catastrophic failure been undertaken and to reflect final conditions? If so, when did this assessment take place? Yes, 2019 NA - no embankments to fail Yes, 2019 Yes, 2019 Yes, 2017 No
18. Is there a) a closure plan in place for this dam, and b) does it include long term monitoring? Yes and Yes Yes and Yes Yes and Yes Yes and Yes Yes and Yes Yes and Yes
19. Have you, or do you plan to assess your tailings facilities against the impact of more regular extreme weather events as a result of climate change, e.g. over the next two years? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
20. Any other relevant information and supporting documentation. Being decommissioned NA NA NA NA Plan is to assess and rehabilitate as part of the Baneygo operations.

Notes:
1. The hazard rating is used in design to establish design criteria. It considers amongst other things, the worst-case scenarios of release of tailings and water at maximum design level during maximum probable rain and flood events to ensure the suitability of the design to ensure no adverse impact on safety or on the environment.

  • Privacy and Legal Notices
  • Contact Regis Resources

Email Subscription

join our mailing list today to get notified of company developments

Please enable the javascript to submit this form

© 2021 Regis Resources. All Rights Reserved.

Go Top